the loss of the self timer in the GX is regrettable. in addition, the shutter in the GX, whether seikosha, deckel compur, or copal (the shutter used currently in GXs), all are far more reliable and accurate than the old synchro compur. further, and more important, the GX, with its much improved lens (and don't say it's "only coatings," coatings matter BIG TIME) and fine near spot meter, is a tremendous improvement over the f model (is the selenium averaging meter in the old cameras any better than the sunny 16 rule?). the current leather covering is also a whole lot classier than the old black pebble stuff. i dare the anti-GX crowd to point to any plastic part on the GX that is metal on the older models. weighing in at 40g more than a 2.8f type 4, the GX has just as much metal (and just as little plastic) as any of its storied forebears. but the simple fact is that the GX is the best TLR that rollei ever made. and granted, they are a tremendous value for the short money they command. granted, the old rolleis are beautiful in their own peculiar art-deco way. The high list price of the GX seems to make it a target for abuse.
However, I won't try to defend that observation scientifically! Totally subjectively, there is a general belief that the Xenotar is sharper and the Planar is warmer. Overall, there is a slight preference among users for the Planar. Also, you must decide between the Planar and the Xenotar lenses. You will often find his ads in the classified section of Shutterbug magazine.By the way, if you are not familiar with Rolleis, not all 2.8F's have 120/220 capability or a removeable waist level finder (which enables the attachment of a prism, if desired).
Most old-time users do not care for the lighter, more "plastic" feel of the GX, although none of us would scorn one as a gift! One very reputable dealer in second-hand Rolleis in the United States is Hadley Chamberlain in southern California. The older 2.8F has a heftier build and a truly timeless feel. An older prism in mint condition (no separation of the glass elements, a common problem) runs about $300 (the current Rollei prism is $995 new at B&H).
#Rolleiflex 2.8 full#
A full overhaul for an older camera runs about $300 from Harry Fleenor, and a Beattie replacement screen runs about $150 if you need it. However, you should be able to get a beautiful, late 12/24 Rollei 2.8F Planar or Xenotar with removeable waist level finder for anywhere from $800 to $1800 used, depending on condition, how patient you are and whether you want to go through a well-known dealer or take your chances on an auction sale (such as eBay). If you can afford a GX at $3500 (see: ), then I'm sure you will enjoy using it.
0 kommentar(er)
